Date: 11 May 1999 14:49:48 -0000
Message-ID: <19990511144948.649.qmail@nym.alias.net>
From: Ramsey <ramsey@nym.alias.net>
To: cheesy21@email.com
Subject: Thank You
MIME-Version: 1.0

Dearest Patti,

>Oh my gosh! that was so horrible I couldn't even read it all! 
>You save that letter because you have some threats there that 
>you may be able to do something about if you ever find it 
>necessary. Also sounds like this person may try to hurt you, or 
>Patsy. If Patsy is cleared of this, I have a feeling this person 
>will not believe it and may try to harm either you or Patsy.  At 
>the very least if someone does start stalking the family, the 
>police can track down this person and see if he has an alibi.

Thank you for your sympathy. I never thought about him actually 
harming us. Well, I talked to him about stalking. Either way, I 
have his first and last name. I also know where he lives. I do 
have friends who know a lot about computers and the Internet. I 
would have to to get through even one of these e-mails. You see, 
these mails are encrypted, then decrypted; in-route, routed 
through anonymous servers, etc. I did not figure this out by 
myself.

>>>I am also considering sending you a letter that I will not 
>>>admit to writing. I do have possession of it. You can it like 
>>>you want to.

I left out the word "take". I meant to say, "you can take it like 
you want to." It was just a very special mail that I would like 
to share with you, signed Patricia.

>Do you want me to send you any posts at the forum that I think 
>you might be interested in or need to address?

Please. And also, is there any way you can omit all the http 
writing?

>I will be here most of the day, please write back soon.

Thank you for warning me about Gail. I sent her the following 
mail. Don't tell her I sent you a copy. Thank you, Love.


Gail,

How are you? I understand that you posted a private mail I sent 
to you. I want to clarify a few things with you. I did not intend 
to have that message posted to any public forum. Once you DID 
post it, the negative feedback from it prompted me to have the 
full version of my theory posted to another forum, by a friend of 
mine. I have NEVER directly posted to a forum and never will.

Gail, I am sorry that you believe the Ramsey family is guilty, 
hence, making every attempt, including posting to a forum, to be 
exonerated. I assure you that Mr. Haddon, Mr. Morgan, or even a 
friend of this family, Michael Bynum; is not using the Internet 
to try out new theories. It is beneath the attorneys and the 
friends of this family. I assume you think I am possibly, 
Rachelle Zimmer? Correct me if I am wrong.

Gail, I wish you only the best. I would rather you not post mail 
I send to you, but if you must; there is little I can do about 
it. Your original post caused me to ask a friend to make the 
first post ever from this address. I'm not upset with you. I 
think you honestly want justice for JonBenet. We all want justice 
for her. That is why the Ramseys cannot be convicted, allowing 
the real killer to kill again. Please continue your fight for 
justice for our JonBenet.

Thank you